Religious Exemptions
Note:
States in light orange have child welfare religious exemptions, but they only apply to certain agencies. In Alabama and Michigan, the law applies only to state-licensed agencies that do not receive state funding; if the agency receives state funding, the exemption does not apply. In Utah, the law applies only to private agencies, and it also requires those agencies to refer individuals they refuse to work with to other agencies that will work with them. Click the “Citations & More Information” button for more detail.
Recommended citation:
Movement Advancement Project. 2026. “Equality Maps: Religious Exemption Laws.” www.mapresearch.org/equality-map/religious-exemptions/#child-welfare. Data as of June 12, 2026.
Percent of LGBTQ Population Covered by Laws
*Note: These percentages reflect estimates of the LGBTQ population (ages 13+) living in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Estimates of the LGBTQ population in the five inhabited U.S. territories are not available, and so cannot be reflected here. Population data are from UCLA’s The Williams Institute.
Targeted exemptions provide a blanket exemption, or license to discriminate, to anyone operating in a specific area, such as medical services and health care. The person or organization does not need to seek out this exemption as with RFRAs; it is a blanket license to discriminate. This map shows targeted exemptions for medical providers, which permit medical providers to refuse to serve LGBTQ people and others, if doing so conflicts with the provider’s (or provider’s employer’s) religious beliefs.
Recommended citation:
Movement Advancement Project. 2026. “Equality Maps: Religious Exemption Laws.” www.mapresearch.org/equality-map/religious-exemptions/#medical-providers. Data as of June 12, 2026.
Percent of LGBTQ Population Covered by Laws
*Note: These percentages reflect estimates of the LGBTQ population (ages 13+) living in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Estimates of the LGBTQ population in the five inhabited U.S. territories are not available, and so cannot be reflected here. Population data are from UCLA’s The Williams Institute.
Targeted exemptions provide a blanket exemption, or license to discriminate, to anyone operating in a specific area, such as the provision of marriage-related services. The person or organization does not need to seek out this exemption as with RFRAs; it is a blanket license to discriminate. This map shows two types of targeted, marriage-related exemptions. The first type allows private businesses to deny marriage-related services (such as photography, floral, web design or other services) to LGBTQ people and others, if doing so conflicts with their religious beliefs. The second type applies to public officials and permits state and local government employees and officials to decline to issue marriage licenses or marry couples of whose marriage they disapprove, despite it being part of the job description to provide these marriage services.
*Note: In 2015, the Kansas governor issued an executive order allowing religiously-owned organizations to refuse to provide marriage-related services. Because this does not apply to private businesses generally, it is not included in the map above.
*Note: In October 2025, the Texas Supreme Court issued a rule change clarifying that judges cannot be compelled to perform marriage ceremonies if it conflicts with their “sincerely held religious beliefs.” Because this does not apply to all public officials, it is not included in the map above.
Recommended citation:
Movement Advancement Project. 2026. “Equality Maps: Religious Exemption Laws.” www.mapresearch.org/equality-map/religious-exemptions/#marriage. Data as of June 12, 2026.
Percent of LGBTQ Population Covered by Laws
*Note: These percentages reflect estimates of the LGBTQ adult population (ages 18+) living in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Estimates of the LGBTQ population in the five inhabited U.S. territories are not available, and so cannot be reflected here. Population data are from UCLA’s The Williams Institute.
Broad state religious exemption laws, sometimes called “Religious Freedom Restoration Acts” or RFRAs, permit people, churches, non-profit organizations, and sometimes corporations to seek exemptions from state laws that they say burden their religious beliefs. The individual person or organization must seek out an exemption, such as through court proceedings.
Movement Advancement Project. 2026. “Equality Maps: Religious Exemption Laws.” www.mapresearch.org/equality-map/religious-exemptions/#broad. Data as of June 12, 2026.
Percent of LGBTQ Population Covered by Laws
*Note: These percentages reflect estimates of the LGBTQ population (ages 13+) living in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Estimates of the LGBTQ population in the five inhabited U.S. territories are not available, and so cannot be reflected here. Population data are from UCLA’s The Williams Institute.
key
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
| State | Targeted Adoption/Child Services Denial | Targeted Medical Professionals Denial | Targeted Marriage Services Denial | Targeted Marriage License Denial | Broad Religious Exemption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation | Citation | Citation | Citation | Citation | |
| Alabama |
|
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| Alaska |
|
|
|
|
|
| American Samoa |
|
|
|
|
|
| Arizona |
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
|
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| Arkansas |
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
|
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
|
Indicates and anti-LGBTQ Law
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| California |
|
|
|
|
|
| Colorado |
|
|
|
|
|
| Connecticut |
|
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| Delaware |
|
|
|
|
|
| District of Columbia |
|
|
|
|
|
| Florida |
|
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| Georgia |
|
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| Guam |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hawaii |
|
|
|
|
|
| Idaho |
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
|
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| Illinois |
|
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| Indiana |
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
|
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| Iowa |
|
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| Kansas |
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
|
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| Kentucky |
|
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| Louisiana |
|
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| Maine |
|
|
|
|
|
| Maryland |
|
|
|
|
|
| Massachusetts |
|
|
|
|
|
| Michigan |
|
|
|
|
|
| Minnesota |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mississippi |
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
|
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
|
Indicates and anti-LGBTQ Law
|
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| Missouri |
|
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| Montana |
|
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| Nebraska |
|
|
|
|
|
| Nevada |
|
|
|
|
|
| New Hampshire |
|
|
|
|
|
| New Jersey |
|
|
|
|
|
| New Mexico |
|
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| New York |
|
|
|
|
|
| North Carolina |
|
|
|
|
|
| North Dakota |
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
|
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| Northern Mariana Islands |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ohio |
|
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
|
|
|
|
| Oklahoma |
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
|
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| Oregon |
|
|
|
|
|
| Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| Puerto Rico |
|
|
|
|
|
| Rhode Island |
|
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| South Carolina |
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
|
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| South Dakota |
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
|
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| Tennessee |
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
|
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| Texas |
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
|
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| U.S. Virgin Islands |
|
|
|
|
|
| Utah |
|
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| Vermont |
|
|
|
|
|
| Virginia |
Indicates an anti-LGBTQ Law
|
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| Washington |
|
|
|
|
|
| West Virginia |
|
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|
| Wisconsin |
|
|
|
|
|
| Wyoming |
|
|
|
|
Indicates anti-LGBTQ law
|

